this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2025
402 points (98.8% liked)

World News

39586 readers
1998 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You definitely could. A hanging lasts less than a day. A trial could stay in the Overton window for much longer.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Sink the boat so it interrupts shipping into one of their waterways. Do it with every sabotage boat from now on.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

like Trumps? or Epstein? or the Pandora Papers?

the list goes on and on.

Overton window is broken. Putin threw someone out of it.

[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

The point in question here is how public the event would be, not how effective. So in that regard, yes, Trump's and even Epstien's trials were quite public, regardless of how effective they were at rendering justice.

You're attacking a straw man, which is how effective the judicial system was. As for that attack, you're absolutely right. Those three instances had laughable results and dumbfounding failures of justice.