this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2023
-1 points (47.6% liked)

Asklemmy

43945 readers
676 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've been speaking with other more informed communists and they've told me that none actually exist. Is this true?

China, Laos, and Vietnam: now notoriously capitalists. Workers work 12+ hours with no protection in horrible factory conditions. Suicide rates are so high that suicide nets are installed. The air is so polluted millions die from lung cancer, especially factory workers w/out basic masks. Corporations dominate

North Korea: Undemocratically ruled by the Kim dynasty. Jong un indulges lavishly at the expense of his citizens, ordering millions in fine wine and trips from Denis Rodman. They might be the most socialist though, as Juche seems to otherwise be democratic.

Cuba: Sanctions have taken a massive toll, but even taking that into account the country still has its own problems. They have massive food shortages and inventory probs and aren't self sufficient after 60+ years. Why couldn't they've use machinery imported from the Soviet Union to develop their agriculture and fishery? The Soviets supported them heavily. They seem to be incredibly mismanaged or corrupt

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] anarchost@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I would love to see an example of your own critical thinking:

Would you have preferred a vote, instead of the United States government unilaterally deciding to support the ethnic genocide of Gazans by Israel?

[โ€“] Maoo@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I will wait for you to reply to the things I've said.

[โ€“] anarchost@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You simply can't answer, can you. Why so scared?

[โ€“] Maoo@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Me: writes paragraphs explaining my thoughts and answering your questions and ask a few questions, all of which you ignore.

You: write 1-2 sentences in response, usually just asking new questions rather than engage.

Sure buddy, I'm the scared one.

[โ€“] anarchost@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Would you have preferred a vote? Yes or no?

Brainless bluster just makes you look smart to stupid people.

[โ€“] Maoo@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How novel: ignore what I say, ask a question.

[โ€“] anarchost@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Would you have preferred a vote? Yes or no?

Nobody should trust your advice on critical thinking if you can't even reach a simple conclusion.

[โ€“] WideningGyro@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago

"Would you have liked to vote on whether to have a genocide?? It's a simple question, coward!"

How is Maoo's answer to this completely made-up, idealist scenario supposed to prove or communicate anything? You might as well ask him what his opinion on unicorns is, and if he refuses to engage with that question you'll once again have caught him being scared!

[โ€“] Wakmrow@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

I'll answer it.

You're missing the point. You are equating "democracy" as "good". Your question is not relevant to the point being made. They are asking, what is good? What is democracy? And you're responding with "you must agree democracy is good".