this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2025
143 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13632 readers
893 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] darkcalling@hexbear.net 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Eh I think it should be pointed out that most of these fires happen in out-lying areas. Either mildly wealthy people (but generally not super-wealthy bourgeoisie who often have their own private firefighting contracts and have 6 homes anyways) or working class tend to live in those places. It's mostly homes and low-value structures that are destroyed, cheap infrastructure that can be pretty easily replaced type of stuff like equipment sheds and which is usually insured or else stuff owned by petite bourgeois small business types who the bourgeoisie themselves have no problem screwing over in this way.

Most valuable warehouses, factories, railyards, means of production, etc tend to be either in denser areas that don't see fires like this more than singe the edges or else they're on their own plots of well cleared land that fire struggles to get near and do damage to because it's hundreds, a thousand yards from the edge of their clearing to the low flammability materials used in commercial construction such as steel, concrete, stone, etc. And they are as mentioned also insured and it presents the bourgeoisie with the delectable choice of taking the insurance money and not rebuilding, pocketing it or choosing to rebuild and being covered for it.

Mostly it just functions to fuck over a bunch of working class people, takes all their possessions so they have to buy new ones if they're insured (consoom is good) and punishes those not paying the insurance money with a total loss of everything and plunge into economic desperation which of course benefits the bourgeoisie.

This is we must recall a situation where they've decided it's profitable for the world as a whole to burn and get more dangerous and expensive to operate in because of climate change which they're not only not doing anything about but with AI actively advocating reversing the limited progress made and going full hog double down on it. So occasional losses are a part of doing business already in their calculations.

Remember it's also class interests not interests of individual bourgeoisie. Individual bourgeoisie can be fucked over by the interests of their class as a whole. So much of the wealth and interests these days are with the financial bourgeoisie who aren't really impacted by small events like a loss of one factory most of the time (of course industrial bourgeoisie has pretty firm grip on the levers of foreign policy in the US but they're simply greedy and have class interests opposed to services that also help the poor as well and if it comes down to it they might even favor public failures of public services so they can push the idea of privatized ones).