this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2023
1118 points (97.9% liked)

World News

39102 readers
2262 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Almost 90 bombs were dropped in one region in just 24 hours.

Russia unleashed an unprecedented bombardment in southern Ukraine overnight in what local officials described as a “massive attack” in the conflict which has continued to rage even as the international community’s attention has moved to the war between Israel and Hamas in Gaza.

The Ukrainian Internal Affairs Ministry on Monday morning said Russia dropped at least “87 aerial bombs on populated areas of the Kherson region - the largest number for all time.” At least eight people were also injured in other Russian strikes carried out in the Odessa region further to the west on Sunday night.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] acidagfc@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Makes sense, UN can only produce a finite amount of concern, not enough to express it on 2 major conflicts.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

UN doing absolutely diddly in two major theaters of conflict rather than just the one.

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The UN's role is to prevent conflict between major powers, not stop all war period. It has done an exemplary job at that, better than any organization in history. There have been no wars between major world powers in the past 75 years. Prior to that, all empires were constantly at each other's throats.

[–] ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

idk how much of that really is the UN and how much can just be attributed to mutually assured destruction

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Good point, but we can understand it as a parallel solution. People deride the UN as a debate society, but that's the point. Countries yell at each other and get domestic points that way instead of attacking each other.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You don't understand what the UN is. It's a common misconception.

The purpose of the UN is to have a diplomatic environment where all can be heard in front of all others. It's to encourage diplomatic solutions to problems and to defuse conflicts.

The UN doesn't have any way to do anything, it's merely a fancy forum. Its members could meet at the UN and decide to do something (although it can be legally complicated) but that's not on the UN.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The purpose of the UN is to have a diplomatic environment where all can be heard in front of all others.

A dialogue that fails to yield productive policy is mere busy work.

It’s to encourage diplomatic solutions to problems and to defuse conflicts.

Right now we're having a debate over whether a ceasefire would be antisemitic. That's not a conversation that behooves diplomatic solutions or defuses conflicts. It just serves to distract public attention while folks in Gaza are exterminated.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We all hope that you'll graduate into the diplomatic corps of whatever place you're in and single-handedly solve the world's problems. Best luck to you.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

There's certain openings. Since the war started, even Biden's designated state department armies dealer can no longer stomach the job.