this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2025
244 points (88.4% liked)

Not The Onion

12663 readers
821 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive link

Not the hotdogs!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] needanke@feddit.org 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

DW started being discussed here – https://lemmy.world/comment/14345095

It was first mentioned as a reply to that comment. It was first being discussed here :https://feddit.org/comment/4011934

He didn't claim that tho? They are insinuating it. Why else would you mention that in a reply to a comment asking to prove a lack of credibility.

Trump/Biden did not in fact hire/fire staff at US Agency for Global Media (USAGM)

In the linked DW-article it says the administration hired/fired stuff. Which is arguably different then them doing it directly, although that is a bit pedantic I guess. My main point is that that alone does not makes RFA an unreliable source. I am using DW as an example because it exists in a similiar framework (directly appointed by a government administration) and yet is credible.

[–] TurtleOnASkateboard@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 day ago

In the linked DW-article it says the administration hired/fired stuff. Which is arguably different then them doing it directly, although that is a bit pedantic I guess

Look the the headline of the thread we are in. It begins KIM JONG-UN BANS HOTDOGS