this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2025
141 points (99.3% liked)
chapotraphouse
13630 readers
824 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I feel individual landlords are more a vestigial form of feudalism rather than big companies taking over being a new form of techno-feudalism (a concept I don't know I necessarily agree with), I think it's more the way capitalism tends to monopolize and drive the petit bourgeois out and into the proletarian class with time.
Individual landlords are random, they could be benevolent and kind, but they are more often capricious, self-serving and generally Hitlerite. Large rental corporations are still bad, but they are often risk-adverse from a liability standpoint and have an economy of scale to allow them to manage problems. Costco is not going to sexually harass you or kill you in a fire because they did the wiring themselves.
Also bigger rental corporations could hypothetically be easier to reign in by the government (not that it will likely happen soon) or be expropriated more easily in any revolution (inshallah).
Yeah that was definitely a very loose use of the term in my post in hindsight. Not a useful way to look at the thing, good call.
VERY good point. Also the creation of the rent-seeking "middle class" via the spread of private renting is a useful tool to maintain class stratification. If the corporations take that away from the petite bourgeoisie a lot of people are going to find themselves in the working class. Might take a couple of generations, but yeah, interesting to think about.
I still can't shake the feeling that anything approaching critical support of this is in very close proximity to straight up accelerationism though. I guess that's why my brain spat out "techno-feudalism" in my post, on reflection.
We'll see.