this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2025
173 points (98.3% liked)

News

23774 readers
3354 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Special counsel Jack Smith is finalizing a two-volume report on his investigations into Donald Trump, covering Trump’s handling of classified documents and efforts to overturn the 2020 election.

At least one volume may be released as early as Friday, despite objections from Trump’s lawyers, who argue the release is politically motivated and unconstitutional.

Trump’s classified documents case was dismissed, and both cases were dropped after his presidential win.

The Justice Department has not confirmed whether both volumes will be released simultaneously.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 28 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Dismissed, but not with prejudice as I recall so it's still possible to take the findings and bring a case again for the same charges. If they're released now at least it makes it more difficult for them to get 'lost' by the incoming DOJ and could be used in the future.

[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 2 days ago (3 children)

bring a case again for the same charges

Trump will be 82 when the possibility of bringing this back up presents itself. And then he and his lawyers will drag it out for years, and then he'll be dead or so old that he'll be alllowed to spend the sentence at home. Meanwhile, the damage he's about to unleash will be done and generations of Americans will suffer from the consequences.

The time to throw Trump behind bars was before the elections, not after. Anything anyone does now is utterly pointless.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Theoretically, Trump could be impeached if the findings are particularly damning. It's not at all likely with the current composition of Congress, but there is another election in 2026. Provided with enough outrage, Democrats could....

Sorry I just passed out from a copium overdose.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Perhaps so, but with the way our system holds onto precedent for reference in the future even a pointless conviction saying the president doesn't have absolute immunity is important to the future. That could be pointed to the next time a Trump-esq sort comes in and starts such BS and used in a new trial or impeachment.

Basically, even if it doesn't do anything to him personally, it could set a guardrail for future years.

[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 days ago

guardrail for future years

But only for a few years. Case in point: neo-Nazis in Germany and genocidal Israeli. If anybody should have stainless steel, bomb-proof guardrails, it's those two. And yet...

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Anything anyone does now is utterly pointless.

Well... Anything that Lemmy's ToS allows us to talk about, at least.