this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2025
223 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

60323 readers
3209 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 49 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I haven't even gotten on the 4k bandwagon yet. I fully expected to by now, but then again, my eyes aren't getting any better and 1080p content still looks... fine.

[–] Cratermaker@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

A few weeks ago I watched Ladyhawk on a 13" TV with a built in VHS player. I realized that my brain didn't care about the quality as soon as I started paying attention to the content. I still like my 1080p but there's definitely massively diminishing returns after that.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I realized that my brain didn’t care about the quality as soon as I started paying attention to the content.

You are a genius! At least compared to everyone seriously discussing how important it is to replace one barely (if at all) visible pixel with 4, or better 9, or 16, more pixels. More of everything. If you are buying a movie that takes up 4 times more space, then it must be 4 times more content. There's such a nice word, "content", as if food for one's brain and soul, which is art, could be factory-produced by the schedule.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I have a 4k TV. I don't think I've ever actually watched something on it in 4k because finding the content isn't worth the effort.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I have to filter out all the 4K feeds I get on Kodi because I can't play them. I sure haven't seen a shortage of them. Now whether they play at an actual 4K would be the question, but they've been there for years.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

That's fair. Maybe effort is the wrong word. Between the extra money for Netflix or HD space to borrow from my friends on the Internet it never seemed worthwhile over 1080.

[–] SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

1080p is fine, but I really like the colors of HDR. I am NOT a fan of the higher refresh rate for movies though.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Higher refresh rates for movies are meh at best, VRR OTOH is a godsend as 24Hz just won't fit into 60Hz. Gaming, too, is much nicer when you have VRR, figures that delayed frames are quite a bit less noticeable than dropped frames.

[–] Toribor@corndog.social 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

1440p at 120Hz+ is superior to 4k 60Hz and is much more achievable for most hardware anyway. That's the sweet spot in my opinion.

For media 4k is a pretty big upgrade from 1080p though.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yes, but 1080p content looks like dogshit on a 1440p display

[–] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Yep. But it looks excellent on a 4K display.