this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2024
88 points (96.8% liked)

Asklemmy

44173 readers
1534 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Feel really guilty, my one family member gave me this. I don't use much google stuff anymore and I really dislike the company as it gets more intrusive. Is there anything I can do with this thing besides give it away? Nothing is worse than getting a gift that you can't use.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 125 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Just sell it online and be honest when asked. Gifting culture is too guilt based, just do the sensible thing and plow through that ridiculous social barrier like a bulldozer.

[–] POTOOOOOOOO@reddthat.com 33 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

Yeah. I already informed them I don't feel comfortable with it in the house. But I'm also the type to use TOR on all my devices. So I don't know how paranoid that came off as.

I think I am going to try to trace down where they got it from. I'm thinking Walmart so, they may take it without a receipt I hope.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 12 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

The thing with gifts is to thank them for their intent, even if you tell them why you're not going to keep the item.

If you don't succeed in returning it, you might also consider giving it to someone with a movement disability, for whom the assistance might outweigh the privacy issue.

[–] POTOOOOOOOO@reddthat.com 6 points 19 hours ago

They are fantastic for the disabled. Everyone I know whonis disabled has the Amazon ones for some reason.

[–] moseschrute@lemmy.ml 17 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Best to sell it. Since you use Tor you’re probably already on a watchlist

[–] POTOOOOOOOO@reddthat.com 6 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] necrobius@lemm.ee 10 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Didn't you know? Only criminals use Tor! \s

[–] POTOOOOOOOO@reddthat.com 3 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

I just prefer it to not get pre-aggrigated results.

[–] compostgoblin@slrpnk.net 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I’ve heard this a lot - is it just a common joke in privacy circles, or is anyone using Tor/Tails actually likely to be on a list?

[–] moseschrute@lemmy.ml 4 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

I don’t really know what I’m talking about tbh, but my understanding is the more unique you make yourself, the easier you are to identify. For example, as soon as you use an ad blocker, your browser fingerprint becomes more unique because your average person doesn’t use an ad blocker. Even fewer people use Tor. So if someone knows you are using Tor, then they know you are 1 of maybe 100,000 people instead of millions (idk if those numbers are accurate, but you get the point).

That being said, Tor does do a pretty good job of making you blend into all the other Tor users.

But what I was talking about initially was mostly your ISP identifying your Tor traffic. So you use a VPN, but again you are now more unique than someone not using a VPN, even if your traffic is more encrypted.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

There is a stereo microphone and a camera in that thing. What good would Tor do in that case? That data would still make its way to google, unless you can root the whole thing and put a custom OS on it.

[–] POTOOOOOOOO@reddthat.com 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not running TOR on the nest. That would be dumb. I'm mentioning this is coming from a whole other end of technology. I like privacy. Google is not very private.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

oh ok i thought you were considering tunneling that things traffic through tor somehow

[–] POTOOOOOOOO@reddthat.com 1 points 13 hours ago

No, because the data would still need to find a way to google services

[–] bradboimler@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

They have microphones. They don't have cameras.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Oh i thought it did the motion recognition with a camera, but it actually uses a type of radar.

https://support.google.com/googlenest/answer/10388741?hl=en