113
Best of Steam 2024 - the top performing games on steam, including best sellers on Steam Deck
(store.steampowered.com)
this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2024
113 points (99.1% liked)
Steam Deck
19488 readers
20 users here now
A place to discuss and support all things Steam Deck.
Replacement for r/steamdeck_linux.
As Lemmy doesn't have flairs yet, you can use these prefixes to indicate what type of post you have made, eg:
[Flair] My post title
The following is a list of suggested flairs:
[Discussion] - General discussion.
[Help] - A request for help or support.
[News] - News about the deck.
[PSA] - Sharing important information.
[Game] - News / info about a game on the deck.
[Update] - An update to a previous post.
[Meta] - Discussion about this community.
Some more Steam Deck specific flairs:
[Boot Screen] - Custom boot screens/videos.
[Selling] - If you are selling your deck.
These are not enforced, but they are encouraged.
Rules:
- Follow the rules of Sopuli
- Posts must be related to the Steam Deck in an obvious way.
- No piracy, there are other communities for that.
- Discussion of emulators are allowed, but no discussion on how to illegally acquire ROMs.
- This is a place of civil discussion, no trolling.
- Have fun.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Pretty much the same titles over and over again.
I'll never not be shocked at BG3 because it runs potato quality but to each their own, I suppose.
Agree. AAA titles aren't suited to run on a Deck and should be streamed from a PC with remote play....but I this k this is the appeal of having the games in a portable format, that people are willing to put up with such shit performance.
It really depends on the specific game, many older AAA games or non-unreal games run fine.
It's also interesting seeing how some games run much better now than they did on release. CP2077 (non-dlc parts) runs pretty well now for example, much better than it did when the Deck first came out.
I thought elden ring ran beautifully. Is bg3 that rough on deck?
Runs fine on mine but it definitely runs it at a weird res and upscales to maintain performance
I can't say I've ever cared about how a game looks.* Sure maybe it's worth discussing, but it's always the last thing on my list.
I played BG3 (Once, all the way, second time up to act 2) exclusively on my Steam Deck in handheld mode. Sure Act 3 has a little bit of lag, but nothing that ever bothered me. All the characters in the game were unique, I know Gale from Karlach from Lae'zel.
*(Discussion about art style or artistic choice being different, Pixel vs cell-shaded vs realistic etc)
Fair enough. Certainly some devs spend a ton of time making games look incredible so there's obviously a bunch of users like me who do appreciate that, and also many who don't!
I wouldn't say don't.
If your game can't look good on the lowest settings then there's an art-direction problem, not that BG3 has that issue.
I love potatoes, also BG3 works fine on the deck?
Define "fine". Is it playable? Sure. But it also looks quite bad at 800p/low/30fps
I don't think looks bad at all
Ok 🤷
The display of the steam deck is only 720p in the first place.
It's 800p
Oh right, had just assumed it's 720p because the width is 1280. So it isn't 16:9, which is nice but slightly surprising!
Yea it's 16:10
The default settings look pretty bad, but with some setting changes you can get it to look a lot better without sacrificing too much performance.
It's not really the type of game that has to run at a solid 60 FPS or anything.
imma part of the reason it shows up.
Cool!