this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2024
98 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13603 readers
828 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 18 points 17 hours ago (8 children)

Ohhhh you're right. I was reading it wrong. Damn I'm not bright haha

[–] Frivolous_Beatnik@hexbear.net 15 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (6 children)

Well you say that, but your name is Dirt_Owl not Dumb_Owl so jot that down. To quote the chart

12 people were murdered by their employer

3,527 people were killed by an acquaintance compared to 1,674 who were killed by a stranger.

so the bar titles denote the killer not the victim. I'm confused cat-confused

[–] sooper_dooper_roofer@hexbear.net 5 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

12 people were murdered by their employer

12 employers were murdered by their employees

[–] Frivolous_Beatnik@hexbear.net 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

That would make sense, but that's what it says verbatim

[–] sooper_dooper_roofer@hexbear.net 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

relationship of victim to offender

yes, which means the victim is (employer of) offender. the offender killed their employer.

[–] Frivolous_Beatnik@hexbear.net 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Which makes sense, yes. I'm saying, since the start of the thread, that the chart title, the bar labels, and the text on the statista page are conflicting with each other which makes the whole thing look unprofessional.

[–] sooper_dooper_roofer@hexbear.net 4 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

ok nvm I see what you mean. the bottom text is wrong and should be reversed.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)