this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2024
440 points (95.6% liked)

Technology

60059 readers
3375 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
440
Watching the Generative AI Hype Bubble Deflate (ash.harvard.edu)
submitted 1 day ago by sirboozebum@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
178 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] r4venw@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

Where, in that position piece, do they mention o3? Who "proved" this?

Additionally, I'm pretty sure that this "ARC AGI" benchmark is not using the same definition of AGI that you linked to by DeepMind. Conflating them is misleading. There is already so much misinformation out there about "AI", don't add to it.

Lastly, I struggle to take at face value essays written by for-profit companies claiming they have AGI (that DeepMind paper links to OpenAI essays). They only stand to gain monetarily by claiming that their AI is an AGI (to be clear, this is an opinion; I do not have evidence to suggest that OpenAI is being disingenuous).