this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2024
583 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

60044 readers
2903 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 70 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I kinda miss when places would host their own videos instead of relying on youtube, but that's the problem of a centralized internet, the majority of people won't want to leave yt/ig/fb/tiktok/twitter/reddit in order to watch or read whatever you posted.

[–] vithigar@lemmy.ca 31 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Also self-hosted video often has really shitty players.

[–] piecat@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

And the reddit hug of death issue..

[–] dx1@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

So in other words this is a tech issue.

As someone who's written in-browser player and transcoding/server code...the lemmy/mastodon etc. version of this can work, especially if flexible bitrate handling is baked into it (i.e., bitrate offer/acceptance matching over a protocol). You can get this down to YouTube interface + install some software + open a port on your firewall.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Tech issue, infrastructure issue, content issue, financial issue...

Hosting text like lemmy is several orders of magnitude cheaper than video.

[–] dx1@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I meant something a little more peer-to-peer than lemmy/mastodon actually. Each person self-hosting their own.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So, kinda like Freenet or I2P?

[–] dx1@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

If you wanted a privacy angle.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

peertube uses webtorrents and federates on activitypub

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Isn't that what peertube is for?

[–] Nyxicas@kbin.melroy.org 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

People don't want to deal with the heavy costs and load of hosting their own content. That's unfortunately the sacrifice. Google is big enough to house it all, whereas, we'd probably see content from a creator last for a finite amount of time before they end up having to close up shop or beg for donations.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 4 points 2 days ago

Beg for donations? How is being paid for your work "begging"?

As you said, hosting video is not only complicated but just fucking expensive, that's why people don't do it themselves. Google pays for it via ads/premium, not by magic pixie dust.

[–] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 14 points 2 days ago

Let’s help grow Peertube, then.

[–] Korkki@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

Centralisation and large scale has it's benefits. There were also many problems with everybody hosting their stuff by themselves. Enshittification is results of private companies having to go profit first (and google being google of course), not so much because they are the only game in town. Being the monopoly merely enables the shitting on users for profit. I see youtube and many google services more like internet's utilities that are privately owned and that is causing problems, not that they have gotten so big.