I disagree. There are abundant cis women and cis men who go to malls, schools, bars, and streets wearing clothes that they believe make themselves look sexy. If using someone's sexually charged custom pronouns is considered participating in kink then I'd argue going outside wearing anything vaguely sexual like a crop top is also the same level of participating in kink and that is simply accepted by society.

[–] salvaria@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 days ago

Thank you for outlining this, I've never really thought about it that way

[–] Letstakealook@lemm.ee 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Just existing or looking appealing to sexual partners is not kink nor limited to cis individuals. What an awful argument. This individual is expecting others to help with their personal sexual arousal and playing victim when they refuse to participate. They are a goddamn sex pest.

[–] rockerface@lemm.ee 5 points 3 days ago

The difference between a kink and a social custom is how much we're used to it

[–] anothercatgirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I used cis individuals as representative of the majority (who accepts themselves) rather than an exclusive group.