this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2024
139 points (94.3% liked)

Technology

60044 readers
2709 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 66 points 3 days ago (3 children)

What we don't need are police that are. I don't want police firing anti aircraft guns/missle barrages or having drone armies. It's absolutely ridiculous to think that this is worth the thought, much less a single cent to fund.

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago

I don't want police [...] having drone armies.

But they want.
(and they haven't even asked you)

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You know, there's no reason we can't have anti-drone fireworks.

They don't really even need dangerous amounts of explosives, they just need a strong net to get caught in a prop.

Drones are pretty damn slow if you compare it to a rocket.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I am thinking like silly string or something a bit more durable pressed into a ball. Launch it and some part of that sticky string is going to catch it.

That works too. It just needs to get caught in a single prop for it to go down

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

There’s exactly zero chance of that happening given the abundance of air traffic in the U.S. (Also specifically where these “drone” sightings are for obvious reasons).