Look, I was there when email was a ISP thing. All emails looked the same everywhere because there was no support for anything but text, so that's a supremely nerdy nitpick that doesn't apply to the conversation.

I very much remember the mess when HTML and rich text emails were introduced. I remember back and forths about missing attachments. It was nowhere near as rosy as you remember.

Anyway go touch grass or whatever. My point only is that email went though similar growing pains and it was only helped in the mainstream initially due to ISPs and later on due to massive centralization. The same thing we're trying to avoid with the fediverse.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

No, I'm not saying it was rosy, I'm saying it was mostly text and then it was mostly hotmail and then it was mostly gmail.

And I'm saying none of that matters, because "it's just like email" is a weird meme that people try to use to justify the weird or hard to understand parts of Masto to normie users and it has never once worked. Because it's not just like email in any way that matters to an end user.

I have, in fact, touched grass today, though. So there's that.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

the use of saying "it's like email" is to explain how lemmy.dbzer0.com can talk to lemmy.ml, similar to how gmail can talk to hotmail and why in fact there's lemmy.dbzer0.com and lemmy.ml (in the same way there's gmail and hotmail). That's it and doesn't need to go deeper than that to be a useful comparison.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well, it does if the person on the receiving end gets nothing useful from it. That's my point, the confusion around Masto specifically wasn't "why do people with different handles get to talk to each other?" That's something that enthusiasts and developers care about and users don't even notice.

The question that was being asked was "why do I need to pick an instance at all and what does it affect?" and that didn't even BEGIN to explain the mess of themed instances, personal instances, effects of instance population on post distribution, manual blocks and defederations, what things did and did not make the leap cross-instance and the whole bunch of other details that matter.

A much better answer was "it doesn't matter, just sign in to mastodon.social and call it a day", but people used to be reticent to argue for centralization, because... decentralization!, so...

Ultimately the answer to that problem ended up going to Bluesky, which I think was very much a problem with both the design and the community at Masto. I actually think the Lemmy/MBin/Fedia Reddit-like corner of federated services is much more workable than a Twitter substitute. And it doesn't even need a bad email analogy to kinda just work, either.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Eh, whether bluesky is the answer remains to be seen.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 1 points 3 days ago

It depends on the question, I suppose, but they've clearly broken into the mainstream in a way Masto did not when it had the chance.