World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
view the rest of the comments
I'm sure that the CIA backed Radio Free Asia doesn't have a US bias slant
... Are you saying there aren't any north Koreans involved in the war?
Because at this point that is akin to denying the sun is warm.
Don't waste your keystrokes to argue, it's an .ml idiot.
That you're trying to claim that I've said things that I did not. I'm saying that radio free Asia is CIA propaganda that puts a western slant on their propaganda.
Mentioning that in this context does give the distinct impression you want to cast doubt on the fact that NK conscripts are being employed by russia though. Why else would you mention that here?
Does it? I think this person suggests that this media outlet is making shit up. As to why mention it - because making them cartoonishly evil diminishes the weight of what they've really done - among other things.
The article literally just quotes a few leaders like the hundreds of other articles on this topic. The fact none of you even read it and can’t seem to do anything but attack the source doesn’t exactly suggest good faith. I suppose every comment not talking about the burning faces is a distraction.
Quotes their comments on the presence of nk troops, not on the implied systematic face burning. And then they admit they cannot verify the video. It's the fucking buryats all over again
Go back to .ml
Does it make you uncomfortable to hear information that you disagree with despite it being true?
That's a very strange question for you to ask based on your rejection of information you disagree with.
It's not a matter of disagreeing with it, the sole purpose of RFA and RFE is propaganda
And yet it could still be true information that you're disagreeing with simply because the source is propaganda. You do understand that propaganda and falsehoods are not the same thing, yes?
Something about a broken clock?
Would that 'broken clock' include the BBC article I gave you a link to? Just out of curiosity. You don't seem to have dismissed it as propaganda.
The BBC article doesn't make the false claim of Russia burning off their faces to keep it a secret.
It literally does.
It's pretty damn foolish of you to deny the contents of an article are in the article twice.
If it were true it would exist in the real world, outside of your .ml echo chamber
Lemmy.world ironically talking about echo chambers?
They are talking about .ml unironically, outright saying the truth - that .ml is a pure tankie propaganda instance and 99% of the time someone from there comes out to spout unsupported claims, get into a "PROVE MY EXTRAODINARY CLAIMS AREN'T TRUE" argument, loses it immediately and still tries to excuse a murderous regime literally melting the faces of their soldiers so they couldn't be recognized by anyone.
Is this information here with us now?
Cool. Here's the newsweek article on the same thing that has a link to Zelensky's Twitter post where he says the thing. https://www.newsweek.com/zelensky-says-russian-troops-burning-faces-killed-north-korean-soldiers-2001980
Newsweek is also trash, but for different reasons.
Awesome.
Like NK soldiers are there and we know they're there. This explanation doesn't seem to pass the straight face test.
Also trash
I have a feeling that you would say any source with this information is trash by virtue of it having information you don't like.
And you would be wrong, Newsweek is owned by right wing Christian fundamentalists and RFA is CIA propaganda
Go on. Now do the BBC.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cdxz0ygl7gko
Point where it says Russia is burning off their faces to keep it a secret
Seriously?
All you had to do was read the article and you didn't bother because you're too convinced you're right and all of these sources are lying.
It's not even a very long article.
I don't even have a horse in this race, but it's kinda crazy how badly people seem to want to believe this one crazy detail of an already unbelievable conflict
a: they're paraphrasing zelenski there, and,
b:
They're all reporting on the same tweet, it's not surprising that none of them have been able to verify it
That really doesn't change my point. All three articles give the same information.
Yea I don't disagree. It's just an incredible claim and it's surprising that it's apparently not being scrutinized much in the reporting.
People really want to take this as granted, and that's kinda the point of manufactured consent.
It does, but that doesn't necessarily mean its reporting is false.
Come on! Say something about the USSR!
3x3 Bingo? Please. 5x5 or go home.
...Man I miss State Department Bingo.
You're not helping promote journalistic integrity.
All you're doing is saying "it's okay to be biased when it supports my side."
Great comeback. When people are quoting the literal CIA funded outlet Radio Free Asia as a source, which is known for making outrageous claims against any enemy of America without evidence, say "Russia and China bad" and poof everything is proven.
Except there are multiple pictures of it happening, plenty of analysis on youtube and a shitload of other sources. But sure, in delululand, when you don't see anything it doesn't exist.
Trying to conflate the USSR and Russia is infantile
That's why they're listed separately I guess
It's like they can't read lol
There is also video evidence of this
You're not wrong but you're not right.
Yea that OR the orcish orcs are orc(k?)ing..
Whatever makes the most sense to you I guess...