this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2024
373 points (99.0% liked)

politics

19237 readers
2059 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The second Trump administration could dismantle key government agencies aiding working people, particularly the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).

Created after the 2008 financial crisis, the CFPB has secured major consumer wins under Biden-appointed director Rohit Chopra, such as capping overdraft fees and banning excessive credit card late fees.

Trump previously weakened the agency, and his return could prioritize corporate interests.

Progressives are urged to defend the CFPB’s achievements and use its success as a rallying point in future political campaigns.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

A lot of working people voted for this.

Yup. They were told exactly what was going to happen, and they voted for it.

It's important to continue to spotlight the dismantling of the working class support and blame the people in power.

What? Blame the people in power? For doing exactly what they were voted into power to do? Blame the people who voted them in.

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Enjoy the schadenfreude of the leopards eating their faces. But at some point you'll either have to forgive them once they realise they've been hoodwinked by psychological warfare waged on the news and social media by individuals and organisations with geopolitical and corporate greed aims in mind, then rebuild your public institutions together and educate them to throw off these infective and destructive ideas and dogma.

Or shoot them in a gruelling civil war, and beat them so resoundingly that their ideology remains burnt and buried with them and Sherman himself would say "fucking hell".

Hope and strive for the first, but prepare for and pray the second doesn't become the only way.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Oh sure, I've said plenty of times that there has to be a path to redemption, and I still believe that. But that hinges on those people recognizing their error and seeking to correct it.

Until that happens, it will be "Or shoot them in a gruelling civil war, and beat them so resoundingly that their ideology remains burnt and buried with them and Sherman himself would say "fucking hell"."

Prepare, indeed. !Resist@fedia.io

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

That's good but it's not enough to act smug, no matter how righteous it is, standing on the moral high ground if you want others to get up there, you have to lend a hand to lift others up.

Have faith, speaking as a Brit that voted remain who had to deal with the idiotic decision made by half the population, the majority of those people can be redeemed.

But you have to reach out and try to engage with them verbally in a non-combative tone, no matter how much you want to scream in their face that they're so dense they make a brick look sharp.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

But you have to reach out and try to engage with them verbally in a non-combative tone, ...

That's been going on for decades. It hasn't worked. In fact, things have gotten much, much worse. And now the fascists have been voted in again, and are going to be taking full control of the entire US government in just over a month.

The time for gentle discussion has passed.

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Well since you think your soapbox has been reduced to splinters, your ballot box has failed, the jury box is crumbling down before you, why don't you crack open the ammo box NOW and take the initiative?

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Best start actioning within a month because after that they won't have to fire the first shot when they have the legal system to hide behind. For example, see Luigi.

[–] mister_flibble@lemm.ee 2 points 5 days ago

Honestly I'd rather "forgive" the ones that didn't vote since they outnumber the Trump supporters by quite a bit. The qanon types can eat crow from here to eternity for all I fucking care at that point, if we can get more people to actually give a fuck we won't need those assholes.