this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2024
465 points (98.5% liked)

News

23634 readers
3991 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Donald Trump is considering privatizing the US Postal Service due to its financial losses, a move that could disrupt shipping and push hundreds of thousands of federal workers out of government.

Citing the USPS’s financial losses, Trump argued the agency should not rely on government subsidies.

While his specific privatization plans remain unclear, Trump previously clashed with the USPS during his first term, attempting to shift control of key functions like labor relations and rate-setting to the Treasury Department.

This move could significantly alter the structure and operations of the USPS if implemented.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I have read enough of your comments to know that you know the difference between overwhelming and all.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sure. I do. I don't know how you could know what the people who live in areas that only the USPS is willing to serve overwhelmingly voted for, but feel free to show me those statistics.

And the ones who don't? Fuck them?

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That is about rural Americans, not Americans who live in areas that only the USPS is willing to serve. There is a massive difference.

I'm a rural American. You have to go down a country road and up a highway for about 10 minutes to get to the nearest town. UPS, FedEx and Amazon all deliver right to my door.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They are different, but one is a subset of the other.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And yet you have no evidence of how that subset voted.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You mistake evidence with ironclad proof. They are not the same.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

No I haven't. You've given neither. The aggregate of rural voters in the entire country says nothing about specific areas. It's like saying everyone in Texas votes Republican based on overall results when there are large pockets that don't.

Unless you're going to maintain that all of those indigenous people in remote places who will be seriously hurt by this because they won't be able to get basic things like medicine are Republicans. Because that sure seems to be what you're suggesting.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Since I know you love this stuff... Take a group of 100 people. And ask them to pick A or B. 75% of them choose A. If you then pick a radom subset, the odds are that more than half picked A. Of course there exist subsets that didn't. But that is just how percentages work. That would be evidence, but not proof. Because odds are the subset would have picked A over B, but it isn't proof that the subset did. So. There is no particular reason to think that the subset of rural voters who have no ups and such are exceptionally different from all rural voters as a whole. They may be, but odds are they aren't. Thus evidence, and not proof. Your implication is that rural voters who don't have ups and such service voted more for Harris than Trump? He didn't run on abolishing the usps. So why would that aspect make a difference? In general, rural voters are the ones that will be hurt most by trumps policies, yet per the link, they voted for him. See what I did there. I gave you the next thing to pivot to.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No, it is just not evidence. You are acting like political beliefs in rural areas are evenly-distributed when they absolutely are not.

Are you really suggesting that a very blue rural county in Vermont has people with the same politics as a very red rural county in Montana?

Otherwise, it's simply not evidence of anything other than rural voters are more right wing in aggregate.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You can submit just about anything as evidence in court. So the bar to call something evidence is really low. Not sure why that's the hill you want to die on when there are far better ones.
And you know I am not suggesting anything is uniform. But I was referring to an election result. So it's just the percent that matters in the end.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"Everything anyone says is evidence" is not the argument you think it is.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Just a witty come back? Nothing more.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Amazing you think that rejecting the claim that everything anyone says is evidence is a "witty comeback" and not just a rejection of something absolutely ludicrous.