this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
2009 points (95.7% liked)

Memes

45729 readers
813 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ThisIsAManWhoKnowsHowToGling@lemmy.dbzer0.com 43 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Ok, I have to take issue with this. I will never be an apple user, but until USB-C came out I was honestly jealous of the lightning cable. It is reversible and consistent, two things other phone chargers never were. Sure, for data transfer it's outdated as hell now, but it is still good enough for most uses

[–] stebo02@sopuli.xyz 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It is reversible and consistent

consistent in what?

[–] cujo@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Consistent in frying pins and fraying cables.

[–] Fuzzypyro@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I worked cellular retail for 8 years I’ve never really seen fried pins on iPhones. The frayed cables are pretty much inevitable especially if it is apples first party cables. Shockingly I have had contamination in usbc ports though. It caused several devices of mine to no longer charge due to corrosion. Still not sure what exactly caused it but I suppose it was juice from a vape that leaked into the connector. Basically fried my laptop c ports, my iPads port and my pixel’s port. I still think the move to c was pretty necessary.

Only complaint is cables that have contaminants can easily travel between devices now.

Other than that the protocol support is all over the place.

[–] cujo@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Everyone I know who uses an iPhone has had fried pins on the cable, not necessarily on their device. No one I know personally has had any issues with USB-C.

Though both experiences are anecdotal, I think we can take this away from our conversation at least: no cable design is perfect. Lol!

[–] ThisIsAManWhoKnowsHowToGling@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Consistent in that they used the same type of charger for almost all their devices after they established it. Mini-USB outdoes them in ubiquity, but the connector is usually a piece of shit.

[–] Eufalconimorph@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Mini-USB wasn't very common. Micro-USB was common.

Right, that one. My point about micro-usb being good pretty much only because everyone uses it still stands. USB-C fixed all of my problems with it.

[–] Amilo159@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Consistent in connecting /charging on first try, compared to micro usb.

[–] Phrodo_00@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Lightning's data transfer and charging are subpar, although I'm not sure if Apple is implementing PD fast charging on the new iPhone either.

[–] HRDS_654@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (5 children)

They are not, unless you get the pro as far as I have seen/heard. The regular iPhone is artificially limited to USB 2.0 speeds.

[–] dpkonofa@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

It is not artificially limited. It’s using the board from last year’s Pro model. It doesn’t have a USB3 interface.

[–] p1mrx@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago

USB 2.0 vs. 3.0 data has nothing to do with USB PD charging wattage.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The Pro still doesn't have PD charging.

When they go portless (I'm guessing next year or 2) they don't want people bitching that the charging is slower, so they're not going to support wired charging that's faster than wireless.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

The same law that forces standardised cable by the EU also forces Apple to not go portless, since it needs a standardised port on the device that can be used to charge.

[–] clutchmatic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

This is to force users to use cloud solutions and lock users in the apple ecosystem

I didnt say it was great, I said it was good enough for a very long time. And in all honesty i think its data transfer speeds were always subpar.

My personal pet theory is that it was designed the way it was in order to make a cost-cutting measure look fancy and luxurious.