this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2024
88 points (88.6% liked)

Fediverse

28721 readers
95 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Xylinna@lemmy.world
MrCenny@lemmy.world
TragicNotCute@lemmy.world
automodbeta@lemmy.world
woelkchen@lemmy.world
88
Do you think the mostly limited range of political views is a strength or a weakness of Lemmy? (For example, in terms of attracting new users.) (feddit.nl)
submitted 1 week ago by crimeschneck@feddit.nl to c/fediverse@lemmy.world
257 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Sure, there are always outliers and you can correct me if I'm wrong, but that's just the overall impression I have.

(I wasn't sure if !asklemmy@lemmy.world or this community would fit better for this kind of question, but I assume it fits here.)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That thread is wild. I had no clue slrpunk was like that (I only go to some non-political communities on slrpunk).

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't think slrpnk is "bad" necessarily. The vibe I get is that there's one terrible moderator who the admins are standing up for, because they think he's an anarchist, and they've absorbed the general Lemmy dark pattern that it's okay for a moderator to prune the comments to reflect only the "correct" ideology. But basically aside from that one bad interaction, I really have no problem with slrpnk in general.

[–] Skiluros@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Don't get me wrong, I recognize it's a solid instance and I am going to continue engaging in their communities.

Just the admin reaction was a bit strange. I think mods/admins need to try and take a neutral position as much as possible (exceptions notwithstanding).

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 0 points 1 week ago

Yeah. Sounds right. Me giving them a hard time is intended in the spirit of tough love. One part "hey, you guys are messing up, if you want people to take you seriously I think you should stop doing this" and one part unapologetic "if you didn't want me telling stories about you censoring me, you shouldn't have deleted my comments and banned me when I disagreed with your moderator. In any sane community, you're allowed to disagree with the moderator, and I would like to be vocal to protect my right to do so."