this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2024
716 points (95.4% liked)

Technology

60059 readers
3333 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Anti_Face_Weapon@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Tell that to the social Democrats that build labor rights brick by brick a century ago. A lot of times they litterally starved on strike.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You're right. But they would have literally starved or been mangled by a machine if they had done nothing. Back then, the greatest weapons the top 1% had were hired guns.

A century ago, your choices were to die today on strike, or die tomorrow from starvation or work conditions, even if you play by the rules. Now, the greatest weapon the 1% has is complacency. You can die today on strike or you can play by the rules and the corporate overlords will feed you just enough until you become too expensive to feed.

How do you ask someone to starve when they have a legitimate alternative? Complacency is a killer.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How do you ask someone to starve when they have a legitimate alternative?

I know this was more of a rhetorical question, but for anyone who is legitimately asking this question: you show them that it's not actually a binary choice. There's options like communism and unionization that can both protect them and feed them.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

The best part of long-term solutions is that they're actually solutions. The worst part about immediate satisfaction is that it's only immediately satisfying. If someone has an immediate problem, it's hard to get them to look at long-term solutions.

Sorry, I've been a major downer today...