this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2024
152 points (96.3% liked)

Selfhosted

40708 readers
558 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz
152
FOSS alternative to Google Keep (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 weeks ago by gedaliyah@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
97 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Yes, I know that the are dozens of notes apps. I'm looking for recommendations based on a few features that I like:

  • nice design (including color coding)
  • easy checklists
  • sharing - this one is key. I use a shared shopping list and we both need to add and edit.
  • pinning and archiving (hidden notes)

I don't mind running it from my homelab server, but that is not a requirement. Does anyone use a notes app that you love? Let me know!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They're adding a database to back it?

That's off putting, I liked its simplicity, and it's being open source.

[–] Earflap@reddthat.com 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

https://discuss.logseq.com/t/why-the-database-version-and-how-its-going/26744

I get it. And I don't necessarily disagree with them, but it gives me concerns over the long term viability of the project. If obsidian did blocks the same way logseq did I'd probably jump ship and use that, but you can't really brain dump in obsidian the same way you can in logseq.

[–] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

Same page as you. I found Obsidian but deferred to Logseq instead for two reasons:

  • Open source
  • The block editor

But seeing this post reaffirms I should find an alternative. They want collaborative features, etc. That roadmap is very different from what I was wanting out of a "second brain".

I have already been considering switching back to Obsidian and pairing it with Quartz for publishing.

AnyType seemed close as well, but it has a ton of features I wouldn't use and it's not clear to me how I could generate a website from it.