The Signal messenger and protocol.

1690 readers

2 users here now

https://signal.org/

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

max@lemmy.ml

Mobilecoin (lemmy.zip)

submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by anonvurr@lemmy.zip to c/signal@lemmy.ml

19 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Anybody have any experience with mobilecoin? What is the use case for it? Seems kind of pointless and a lot more tedious than just a bank transfer. Why does signal include crypto nonsense in their app (I like crypto, but just can't see any reason why it should be integrated in the app). I'm sad that signal does not have support for 3rd party open source clients that could remove such features. Why not add support for monero instead?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Mobile coin is a useless fork of Monero. If they had any sense whatsoever, they would have just put a Monero wallet into the app instead of that crap.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I can't take any statements from you about Monero seriously: https://lemm.ee/comment/15410085

[–] jet@hackertalks.com -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why try to start a beef from a old thread?

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

The real question is to shortwavesurfer: Is it actually a Monero fork, or are they just saying the word "Monero" because it's always on their mind?

Because I've seen zero evidence of the former (after wasting my time looking), but plenty of the latter. Thus, not worth taking seriously.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MobileCoin

MobileCoin's mechanics build on Stellar (for consensus) and Monero (for privacy), using CryptoNote alongside zero-knowledge proofs to hide details of users' transactions.[2]

It's a fork of the protocol written in rust, and with proof of stake.

You don't need to actively badger individual users for a discussion that didn't satisfy you from 2 months ago, it doesn't look good and it makes lemmy acrimonious. It's petty.

[–] pedroapero@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 days ago

"a fork of the the protocol" does not make any sense. Do you even know what forking means?

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Can you provide a citation for a claim that it is a fork?

If you're against being petty, lead by example and don't tone police!

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The Wikipedia article and quote I gave you above

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The Wikipedia article and the quote don't mention it being forked from anything. And the word has a strict code definition so if it was, it wouldn't be hard to prove...

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Based on and fork can be used interchangeably in English, this is what the wiki article clearly says.

If you want the full chain of pedantry: They forked the project, then refactored it into rust, then changed the protocol to include proof of stake based on steller.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 0 points 2 weeks ago

According to who and where? You just chronologically ordered things backwards from the Wikipedia article!