this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2024
347 points (85.3% liked)

Science Memes

11299 readers
2612 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jean_le_Flambeur@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 4 days ago (2 children)

All the ones you mentioned except nuclear don't create radiation waste at all.....

[–] passiveaggressivesonar@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Coal waste (fly ash) releases 100 times more radiation than shielded nuclear waste

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/coal-ash-is-more-radioactive-than-nuclear-waste/

I doubt solar wind and hydro create any radioactive waste though. Again though would like to see a comparison of their waste vs the shielded casks

[–] Jean_le_Flambeur@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

The source you give is comparing the direct surrounding of opperating power plants, it is not talking about the nuclear waste. no on argues living near an (safely) operating power plant is too dangerous, its that you get nuclear waste which is the problem. Sure you can wheel it of to somewhere else, but then its a problem there.

I just want to see a comparison between the waste, that's all. If it really is worse I'll accept it as worse

I can imagine It's easier to manage nuclear waste than fly ash

[–] ultracritical@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Uranium is present in coal in high enough quantities that a coal plant releases more uranium to the environment then an equivalent nuke plant burns in its reactor, and mining for materials for solar panels creates literal mountains of thorium salts and other thorium contaminated debris.

Nuclear plants have the unfortunate position that they actually have to manage their nuclear waste due to its concentration. It's not actually hard to store the waste permanently from a technical perspective, it's just difficult to have the political will to actually do it.

In germany we have, after 20 years of search, not one safe place. The one we have for temporal storage is expected to start leaking soon..