this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2024
280 points (99.0% liked)

Selfhosted

40438 readers
422 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Seems like a fairly mature and well maintained project. Can be fired up in DevContainer for hacking.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] good_hunter@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

How quickly those this flood your storage?

Currently I ran invidious in docker. The solution is … just okay, performance isn’t great. But at least you only stream whatever you pick for watching.

I only follow around 15 channels. For simplicity 10 video are added daily to my subscription feed.

Are there privacy concerns with this solution. This together with ad blocking were my main drivers for invidious.

[–] ryan_harg@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 day ago

you can define a retention time for sources (=channels) so you can somewhat limit storage usage.