this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2024
214 points (97.3% liked)

Privacy

32177 readers
409 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I am a long term GrapheneOS user and would like to talk about it. r/privacy on the redditland blocks custom OS discussions which I think is very bad for user privacy, and I hope this post will be useful to anyone who are in the hunt for better privacy.

Nowadays smartphones are a much bigger threats to our privacy and Desktop systems, and unfortunately manufacturers has designed them to be locked down devices with no user freedom. You can't just "install Linux" on most smartphones and it is horrible. And most preloaded systems spy on us like crazy. That was why I specifically bought a pixel and loaded GOS onto it.

According to https://grapheneos.org/features , they start from base AOSP's latest version, imptoves upon it's security and significantly hardens it. There's hardened_malloc to.prevent against exploitation, disabling lots of debugging features, disabling USB-c data, hardening the Linux kernel and system apps etc. They even block accessing the hardware identifiers of the phone so that apps cannot detect whqt phone you're using. That means with Tor and zero permissions given, apps are anonymous.

Compatibility with apps are best in Custom ROMs but there are still that can't work, especially if they enforce device integrity. Very few apps usually enforce that tho. Also their community isn't the friendliest but you can get help. Just don't try and engage too much or have too many debates.

Anyone else here use GrapheneOS, or any other privacy ROMs? What is your experience? Do you disagree on any point? Let's have a discussion!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Not hardened though. I was heavily considering fairphone but over the back and forth between them discussing with Graphene developers, their hardware is not secure enough yet for graphene to be made for the fairphones. If and when fairphones are on graphene then I will definitely buy them.

Also, even though I commend their phone, the accessories for earbuds and headphones certainly bring up some questions as to their intentions.

[–] Azzu@lemm.ee 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

It's because Graphene is not a custom ROM. /e/os is. Graphene is just an OS on top of the ROM, and Fairphone doesn't update their ROM often enough.

This is a complete non-issue though if you use a custom ROM like LineagOS or /e/os.

[–] horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

No. The issue is with hardware secure elements in how cryptographically intensive workloads are done

https://www.androidauthority.com/titan-m2-google-3261547/

Unfortunately the fairphone falls quite behind in this and relies on software salt and hash that can be exploited.

Buying a used pixel and installing Graphene OS is absolutely a more secure platform than any AOSP based open source bootloader unlocked ROM.

[–] Azzu@lemm.ee 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This was not given as reason by the devs why graphene is not on Fairphone. The delayed security updates were.

It's a holistic statement that doesn't factor into this.