this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
641 points (97.3% liked)

Technology

59578 readers
3015 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Automotive research firm finds that Tesla has higher frequency of deadly accidents than any other car brand

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

That's bullshit. EU has halved pollution and energy consumption since 1985, don't tell me it doesn't make a difference to work towards sustainability.

[–] inv3r510n@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

The raw materials don’t grow on trees and aren’t renewable. EVs are a fantasy solution that doesn’t actually solve the problem. The batteries are full of rare earth metals and toxic as fuck.

The problem is consumption itself, but rich Europeans such as yourself pat yourself on the back for being so virtuous when really all you’re doing is replacing one kind of pollution (dead dinosaurs) for another (rare earth metals).

And as we’ve seen with environmental regulations for shipping, now that the ships burn cleaner fuel there’s less pollution, which means less particles for sunlight to reflect off of in the air leading to faster global warming. An unexpected negative side effect of reducing pollution.

Then there’s the freedom issues with EVs. They’re expensive as hell, you can’t work on them yourself or with an independent mechanic, and they can get bricked remotely whether by bad software update, because you missed your payment that month, or a cyber attack. Sorry but if they can brick my $500 phone with a software update there’s no way in fucking hell im allowing these tech companies access to a $25k car. The capitalists will find a way for planned obsolescence so this way the line forever goes up.

Fuck that I’ll take the ICE with minimal computer bullshit in it everyday. My 2013 Subaru Impreza with 230k miles on it is more environmentally friendly than buying some stupid new EV for $50k that I don’t have. Keeping an efficient ICE car on the road for as long as it will drive is more efficient than trading it in for any EV. Raw materials don’t grow on trees.

100 companies produce 70% of the worlds pollution (not including the US military which is the largest single polluter in the world) fuck this EV and no plastic straws or bags bullshit. It’s not on individuals. Capitalism itself needs to be fucking overthrown if we have any chance of stopping climate change. And it’s already likely too late - the time to overthrow was in the 90s and people tried. A whole lot of leftist groups in the US got thrown life in prison as “terrorists” for it. ELF and ALF.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

The batteries are full of rare earth metals and toxic as fuck.

Batteries can be repurposed and recycled, and new batteries are free of rare earth metals.

https://thenextweb.com/news/the-cobalt-free-electric-vehicle-batteries-are-here

No, lithium-ion batteries do not have to use cobalt.

The newer LFP (Lithium Phosphate) batteries already widely in use do NOT use rare earth minerals, and are better than older batteries.
Old fashioned car battery uses lead, and is heavily regulated in EU, and is recycled. The new LFP batteries will probably rid os this use of lead.

Although I do agree with some of your other points, I don't see any of them really relating to the better sustainability of an EV over an ICE. I also don't see an argument against working towards better sustainability.

[–] inv3r510n@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

“Recycling” at least in America is its own form of greenwashing.

https://www.npr.org/2022/10/24/1131131088/recycling-plastic-is-practically-impossible-and-the-problem-is-getting-worse

The only thing I know of that actually gets recycled is aluminum.