this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
137 points (98.6% liked)

World News

39096 readers
2745 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Australia has introduced a bill to ban social media access for children under 16, enforcing strict penalties of up to AU$50 million for non-compliance.

The law would require biometric or government ID for age verification and prohibits parental consent as an exemption.

While aiming to protect children from harmful content, critics argue it may drive teens to unregulated platforms.

Some services, like YouTube and WhatsApp, will be exempt for educational or messaging purposes.

The bill has bipartisan support but faces scrutiny from independents and child welfare advocates.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do you think Lemmy will integrate biometric IDs for Australia?

This affects Adults too.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No, because a lot of people here care about digital sovereignty. Otherwise, we would still be on Facebook. So, if the main developers integrated that into the software, people would strip it out and fire the main software developer, or they would strip it out at every version that got released and then release it without it.

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So it seems shortsighted celebrating what is a law to outlaw things like Lemmy.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I mean, they can't enforce it because there are so many instances all over the world. They can't possibly target every instance administrator.

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago

First of all, yeah they can. Second of all, they get rid of the main ones and suddenly there is a lot less of Lemmy out there.

Not caring about laws isn't something to be proud of. Lemmy will get left behind because the devs don't care about GDPR or laws like these. Admins will get hit by huge fines and lives will be ruined. Same with illegal content being shared to federated instances automatically. You won't be able to explain that it was on your machine "because federation" in court.

[–] bitwise@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

I worry that this will also affect political awareness amongst teens in a way that encumbent parties and business will happily exploit for their own gain.

If it's "successful", expect to see similar legislation proposed throughout the world.