Environment

3924 readers

12 users here now

Environmental and ecological discussion, particularly of things like weather and other natural phenomena (especially if they're not breaking news).

See also our Nature and Gardening community for discussion centered around things like hiking, animals in their natural habitat, and gardening (urban or rural).

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

China’s carbon emissions have now caused more global warming than EU, report says (www.carbonbrief.org)

submitted 2 days ago by 0x815@feddit.org to c/environment@beehaw.org

17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://feddit.org/post/4928706

Archived link

While developed countries have used the majority of this budget, the analysis shows that China’s historical emissions reached 312GtCO2 in 2023, overtaking the EU’s 303GtCO2.

China is still far behind the 532GtCO2 emitted by the US, however, according to the analysis.

The findings by Carbonbrief come amid fraught negotiations at COP29 in Baku, Azerbaijan, where negotiators have been invoking the “principle of historical responsibility” in their discussions over who should pay money towards a new goal for climate finance – and how much.

[...]

Historical CO2 emissions matter for climate change, because there is a finite “carbon budget” that can be released into the atmosphere before a given level of global warming is breached.

For example, in order to limit warming to 1.5C above pre-industrial levels, only around 2,800GtCO2 can be added to the atmosphere, counting all emissions since the pre-industrial period. (This is according to a 2023 study updating figures from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.)

Cumulative emissions since 1850 will reach 2,607CO2 by the end of 2024, according to Carbon Brief’s new analysis, meaning that some 94% of the 1.5C budget will have been used up.

[...]

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] iii@mander.xyz 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's important to measure emissions.

But assigning blame isn't usefull towards reducing emissions. I only see it as a usefull distraction for those preferring non-action.

[–] 0x815@feddit.org 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Again, this is not about assigning blame. This is just a simple fact.

[–] iii@mander.xyz 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Isn't the whole idea of a finite carbon budget per country to assign blame?

It's the total emissions that matter. Even if it's only latvia emitting.

[–] 0x815@feddit.org 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The only way to measure it is where it is produced. This is what this and other reports are doing. Governments could reduce their emissions, especially in countries where they are high. It's not the case, though.

[–] iii@mander.xyz 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The only way to measure it is where it is produced.

How so? Airborn particles can be measured regardless of origin. Even satellite estimates are quite accurate.

Governments could reduce their emissions, especially in countries where they are high.

Again, placing blame.

[–] 0x815@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Governments could enforce laws to reduce their emissions, but they don't.

[–] iii@mander.xyz 3 points 2 days ago

I note that the first question was disregarded.

Goverments could enact laws that make teleportation mandatory. They don't.