this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
560 points (97.9% liked)
A Boring Dystopia
13848 readers
425 users here now
Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.
Rules (Subject to Change)
--Be a Decent Human Being
--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title
--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article
--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.
--Posts must have something to do with the topic
--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.
--No NSFW content
--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
What are you talking about, we had Jill Stein zombies up the ass who are oddly gone missing
I've seen the person who posted this article, return2ozma, called a Russian troll account at least once a week since I joined Lemmy, so color me skeptical. Who knows, maybe you're right, but if so, then you're the instance that cried, "bot," one too many times.
Edit: Based on the original commenters edit, I think we solved the mystery of why all the, "bots," suddenly disappeared.
Why would Jill Stein voters keep talking about Jill Stein now on articles that have nothing to do with her? None of the people who voted for her swayed the election at all. It's not like anyone here is happy Trump won -- we all despise him. Third-party voters are in the same boat and doing the same thing as everyone else: figuring out how to survive or escape a country that just lost almost all its checks and balances.
Sorry, it's true though. Every vote for a third party was a vote for Trump.
Oh FUCK OFF ALREADY with that garbage. It's over.
Sho is. Thanks.
by definition, they weren't
FALSE
every vote for a third party is a vote for a third party. Using your dumbass shitlib logic, every vote for a third party is a vote for Harris if you were a trump supporter.
I'm not missing, not a zombie... some people cope easier with losing by pretending that antigenocide users are bots. I'm still here though amused that the Cheney-loving genocide supporters that lost still think they are morally and intellectually superior.
The blood of those Trump will kill are on your hands, not mine stranger.
And the blood of all those Palestinians killed already by biden is on your hands.
Trump would have killed them anyway, so not really.
Logically you can’t kill people twice. Do better, bot.
Your comment is abhorrent.
Edit: You don't know the person you're talking to. They voted third party and it had no effect on the outcome of the election, yet you are here telling them that they share blame for the harm and death that is about to come to thousands of people at the hands of an authoritarian dictator that they did not vote for.
That is not true and it is not okay. That is straight up abusive. Direct your anger elsewhere.
My hands are clean. I didn't support a genocide candidate. Any blood will be on the hands of the Kamala campaign for praising a war criminal and saying that she'd continue paying tax dollars to Israel to massacre innocent civilians.
Lol Gaza is going to be straight annihilated under Trump and you'll still somehow feel righteous.
Gaza was straight up annihilated under Biden and no I don't feel righteous because it was still my country supporting it. I am proud to not have personally voted for a candidate that feels righteous supporting those doing the enslaving and genocide though. Your argument that people should vote for the plantation owner cause the other one will own more slaves isn't appealing and clearly wasn't a winning strategy. If you were concerned about slaves then you would have rejected the idea of owning plantations altogether.
🎯
One life spared would be harm mitigation and therefor justification. Gaza is not a moral boolean variable
You act like Kamala's position wasn't a choice she made. Do you think she was under some sort of threat of death if she didn't support genocide?
Death, no. Just losing all that campaign funding
So you're saying that had she not supported genocide, that she wouldn't have got enough funding to run her campaign? How is that any better? Are you suggesting that Israel has so much money that a candidate can't win unless they support whatever they do? Hasn't the left been alleging that Israel having massive influence in American politics and media due to money was an antisemtic trope? How does Bernie win while still trying to stop weapon shipments to Israel?
Its not antisemetic to point out a foreign nation is lobbying our government. Theyre far from the only country influencing it, and half our own people are down with it for their own religious reasons. This isnt blood libel. Not least of which for the fact that Israel does not represent all Jews, who- if I recall correctly- are among the only demographics to lean majority-Democrat this last cycle
"You should have worked with the murderer to kill more people instead of taking a chance calling the cops!"
I mean ACAB and all that, but damn
Ah yes the benevolent serial killer that is just expediting the ending of suffering. Kamala was just helping women and kids respawn so they could join back on Team America.
Are you fucking serious right now? None of that is even close to what I said.
You didn't support a genocide candidate, but you failed to prevent an outcome 100x worse. You claim to wash your hands of it, but you're using bullshit as soap.
You can’t prove an outcome 100x worse because the future hasn’t happened yet.
With Biden’s behavior towards Russia post election, there’s no guarantee that Harris bringing us into WW3 wouldn’t be 100x worse.
Yes, that is indeed how the future works, but I'm confident trump is much worse than Kamala on this issue, based on past events, which tends to be the best predictor of future events.
Speaking of which...
The term you should lookup is "appeasement", you should have paid more attention during middle school history, and less attention to whatever conspiracy/propaganda hole that fuckwit opinion dribbled out of.
Cool, why don’t you go look up mutually assured destruction?
Sorry but trying to get Ukraine into nato was nato poking the Russians. The maiden revolution was a color regime change by the west to throw out a pro Russian leader back in 2014 by Obama’s ambassador Victoria neuland.
This could of all been avoided, but then how would the military industrial complex goons afford the remodel on their third bathroom in their fourth house?
Uncle Vlad isn't going to nuke everything he's got simply because he's not allowed to have a little bit more of something that is not his in the first place.
As for Ukraine wanting to join NATO, that only happens after Russia invaded in 2022. There was a vote in 2014, but it had low support in the populace at the time.
You should really examine where you are getting your info from, your view of history and current events is not congruent with reality...
Delusional. The second a single nuke no matter how small is dropped is the second they all start flying. He’s desperate to stay in power and the US is desperate to regime change him.
I expect Harris, if elected, would of given us higher WW3 chances.
We shouldn’t be going through nuclear brinkmanship right now, and there’s been plenty of off ramps to put an end to this but the military industrial complex needs forever wars to function. It’s not a coincidence we find ourselves once again in a forever war just after the last one “ended”.
And what happened in 2014? Oh yeah. Some nato fucking around and regime changing in Ukraine. This could of been avoided.
You're damn right, maybe the bald little baby should quit throwing a tantrum just because he want to take over one of his neighbors, and losing at it.
Yeah! What did happen in 2014?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annexation_of_Crimea_by_the_Russian_Federation
Oh, that happened...
I don’t support him. But the US and Ukraine have had numerous off ramps and instead want a forever war.
I don't recall claiming that you did, but thanks for telling everyone out of the blue about it.
As for Ukraine's offramps... Giving Vlad back his nukes and wanting their established border with Russia respected was to much to ask for his little ego?
I didn't fail to prevent anything. I've never been good at lying to myself and others by pretending that bullshit soap is high quality lavender soap. If you want me to sell lavender soap then give me lavender soap to sell.
Bingo, getting trump elected was the goal all along.
One could say that of the democrats for forcing an unelected candidate as nominee. She didn’t win a single primary vote. They knew when biden announced re-election that they’d lose with their own polling.
They don’t give a fuck about you.
Despite all that, trump has been and will be by far the worst president, and there is barely an excuse not to vote against him, and absolutely none at all to vote for him.
What makes you think trump gives a fuck about you?
Trump doesn’t give a fuck about me.
Trump was terrible, I’d still argue that bush 2 was the worst ever.
Oh yeah, bush 2 was bad, but trump ruined any hope I had of Bush 2 gettting hanged for warcrimes.
Obama had 8 years to hang him, and as per usual with the democrats, nothing was done.
Obama was kind of dealing with other shit at the time, like one of, if not the, largest financial crisis in US history. He had like 2 half-assed wars bush started that needed to be managed, and he had to get Bin Laden. Obama can't do everything I want, but he did a hell of a job putting us back together after GWB.
So it’s trumps fault that bush 2 wasn’t held responsible for war crimes but not Obama’s fault because… reasons?
Jesus Christ these liberals are delulu
Oh no...
Trump's is/will be such a shit basket corrupt hack job, that the overton window for unacceptable president conduct shifted miles away from the shit GWB did.
For all of trumps faults he didn’t start a single war! GWB WAS WORSE BY A LONG SHOT.
The goal of the bots and trolls was to amplify a false comparison, and generate infighting in the anti-trump crowd. The fact that you still exist here is proof that it was money well spent.
So you believe absent bots and trolls that people would have been unified alongside Kamala on their support and commitment to genocide?
Sure. The goal of those bots and trolls was to smear Kamala and make it seem like she is the same choice as "get the job (genocide) done quickly" trump. There were lots of people saying "I can't vote for Kamala because of Israel's genocide" but I never ever heard a single fucking Republican say the same thing about trump. And now we have trump. Well done, dipshits.
Bullshit or you wouldn’t of lost an election in a landslide taking the senate and house with ya.
Liberal tears are so tasty. They can’t handle their shit ass genocidal candidate lost so they blame everybody but their shit ass candidate from a shit ass party for the loss.