this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
306 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19120 readers
3209 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Senate GOP leader Mitch McConnell reportedly warned that there will be no recess appointments, directly opposing Donald Trump’s plan to bypass Senate confirmation for controversial cabinet nominees, including Matt Gaetz.

Gaetz has faced allegations of drug use and sexual misconduct.

McConnell’s stance sparked widespread discussion about a looming constitutional showdown.

Critics argue recess appointments could undermine Senate authority and pose national security risks.

Observers question McConnell’s influence, noting potential leadership changes, while others see this as a critical test of Senate integrity against Trump-aligned Republicans.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 301 points 4 days ago (7 children)

Just a reminder that Mitch McConnell could have prevented this not once but twice.

Good luck (seriously) trying to keep the monster you created and continuously enabled under control. I also hate that I'm implicitly rooting for McConnell here.

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 89 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Don't worry, Trump now will see him as The Enemy and use everything at his disposal against him.

McConnell just might be the first one to draw the ire this term.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 75 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Don't worry, Trump now will see him as The Enemy and use everything at his disposal against him.

I mean, probably. Unfortunately, McConnell's actually right for once. Whether he's right for the right reasons is irrelevant at the moment.

[–] Xanis@lemmy.world 28 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

The enemy of my enemy.

We can agree with him and root for him. Just keep in mind who he is and what he's done. Don't allow a short memory to curb that perspective.

In the meantime, while the monsters fight we should be collectively working to shore up things in our communities. I'm working on mine.

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago (1 children)

We're still pissing on his grave.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 10 points 4 days ago

Accidentally right is still right!

[–] DontRedditMyLemmy@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

Any chance McConnell will fall out a window in the near future?

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm with you, but I don't see Trump going after anyone on his personal revenge list before Obama and Biden. Won't start the deportation/concentration camp bullshit in earnest until after a few of those because he has to prove to the legislature that he controls them before he does anything too unpopular or evil.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 1 points 12 hours ago

McConnell realizes that Trump's a lame duck. The Congresscritters want to remain in office in '26 and after. They don't give a shit what happens to Trump.

[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 22 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The good news is in party fighting is s good sign that they won't be able to consolidate power as quickly or completely as they wanted to. The bad news is, they now know who to come for on the night of long knives.

[–] jaxxed@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

There is consensus that the current nominations for cabinet are heavily oriented to separating the disloyaistlls in order to define targets. McTurtle in his prime was a competitor, but I imagine it will be easy to move against him these days

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago (2 children)

When the worst guy starts fighting a twice as worst guy, you have a relative good guy to root for.

[–] TrippaSnippa@lemm.ee 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The enemy of my enemy is still my enemy, but I want to see the former hurt the latter first.

If my enemies destroy each other, I'm certainly saved some effort. Go for it, champ!

[–] Exusia@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

This enemy of my enemy is not my friend, the moment is merely a temporary truce for the greater good.

[–] Pretzilla@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Moscow Mitch took hundreds of millions in Russian 'investments' for I think an aluminum plant.

He's dirty as fuck and just needed a call from his handler to remind him which way to vote on that.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago

Bad people can do good things sometimes, and you should never interrupt or shame them for doing it. Many people on the internet forget that.

[–] ChocoboRocket@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

Never thought I'd see the day where I hoped a McConnell plan would work in any capacity.

He's allowed Trump to exist so project 2025 can happen.

Moscow Mitch will do anything to make project 2025 happen, maybe he was convinced the "normal" Republicans can mitigate Trump's penchant for treason and sedition against America and that mitigation risk was worth the project 2025 payout.

Hopefully he is right about mitigating Trump. Otherwise, I hope McConnell is the first Republican publicly executed because Trump absolutely wants to be able to publicly execute anyone he doesn't like.

As much as he probably wants to please Big Daddy Trump I think he also wants to assert himself a little by saying, "Here's your McDonald's. I took a few fries and yes, I'll do it next time too."