this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
216 points (87.5% liked)

Technology

59555 readers
3335 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Chozo@fedia.io 30 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It actually makes quite a lot of sense if you think about it. Poems generally follow a structure of some sort; a certain amount of syllables per line, a certain rhyming scheme, alliterative patterns, etc. Most poems as we know them are actually rather formulaic by nature, so it seems only natural that a computer would be good at creating something according to a set of configured parameters.

[–] LuxSpark@lemmy.cafe 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

And knows all the words and how they rhyme.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Poetry is about the message and sentiment so now anyone can be a poet as long as they can generate something that resonates with a group of people.

Although most modern poetry is something like copyright for ads or maybe a video game. So I am sure companies will try to reduce staff on that and pay for this.

I still don't buy they are a replacement for humans doing it tbh though based on the graphic art you around. Even when it is "right" it still has this generic slop vibe.

Peoper editing likely could reduce that feel.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

These typos pass "lurkers mental captcha" see ain't AI bot!

Nah... I just suck

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

I've got more than my share of typos, but they aren't always as funny :)

[–] Rozz@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I don't follow poetry, but there could be a resurgence of abstract or non pattern following poetry, just like most art has movement that move along with what is happening in the world.

[–] treefrog@lemm.ee 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

The patterns in poetry date back to when writing was less common. They're mnemonic devices.

Today, they're still valuable when performing poetry.

I tend to not follow typical rhyme patterns, use off rhymes, non-ending lines, alliterations, etc. instead. I always found the typical rhyme schemes I was taught in school stifling, but as I've practiced my craft more, I have gotten more comfortable incorporating them into my toolbox.

Anyway, so many non-poets commenting in this thread. People who are serious about poetry know that they're unlikely to make a living off it. We write because we get joy out of making and sharing our art. A lot of poetry is still performed at open mics and poetry slams. And most of it is shared with people we know who appreciate it. In other words, most poetry isn't written with the intention of ever publishing it.

It's something we enjoy playing with, in other words. And until a machine can experience joy and playfulness, they're not doing art. Only copying it.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 1 points 4 days ago

The only poetry I see going around is Rupi Kaur poems, which fits your description. I rarely see someone referencing any of these, for example. Could be due to my social circles, but I don't really see it in mass media either.