this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
118 points (93.4% liked)

Asklemmy

43945 readers
504 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] MrFunnyMoustache@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Pretty sure they are not protons anymore once something is inside it.

[โ€“] davidgro@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The positive charge would remain though

[โ€“] MrFunnyMoustache@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is that so? I assumed that a small black hole would rip apart a proton through spaghettification, therefore it won't have two up quarks and one down quark. But even if the charge remains, such information can't escape therefore its electric charge won't influence the universe.

I might need to read up more on this.

[โ€“] davidgro@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yup, there's a theorem ("no-hair theorem") that the only information about a black hole which does influence the universe is its mass, spin, and electric charge.

[โ€“] MrFunnyMoustache@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Oh, I stand corrected.

[โ€“] luthis@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 year ago

You may be right, but I have yet to have evidence to the contrary.