Asklemmy

43939 readers

496 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

118

The magic genie has appeared to grant you your wish. What small thing do you wish for that would have the biggest positive impact on the world? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 year ago by Weirdbeardgame@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

209 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Nonameuser678@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hate to be a killjoy but C02 is only one greenhouse gas and not even the worst one.

[–] TheBananaKing@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Per kilo, sure. But in terms of overall impact, I'll lay odds that reducing the CO2 level down to preindustrial levels would be more effective than reducing any other pollutant.

[–] Nonameuser678@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago

Methane would be more effective than C02. Methane is the elephant in the room no one talks about