Technology

59555 readers

3438 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

841

Bluesky Might End Up Defeating Twitter Once and for All (slate.com)

submitted 1 week ago by psychothumbs@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

317 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

The great thing about BlueSky is how under-the-radar its flown for the last few years. Virtually no advertising. No legions of bot accounts spamming with invites and generic attention baiting posts. No |>u33y N |3io blowing up my mentions. No enshittification, because its just a primitive clone of the original Bird Site.

The more popular it gets, the less likely that'll last. BlueSky won't defeat Twitter until it becomes Twitter.

[–] realitista@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It will almost certainly become Twitter as it was created by the Twitter founder. The only difference being that it will become the Twitter from before Musk took over. Which is a massive difference.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The only difference being that it will become the Twitter from before Musk took over.

Dorsey is just as emotionally stunted and socially reactionary as Musk. He simply isn't as wealthy.

BlueSky has thrived not because Dorsey crafted it into a purer vision, but because he's neglected it and allowed the user base to have their way.

[–] realitista@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I never liked Twitter to begin with so I'm not one to defend him. My preferred one is Mastodon, but generally I don't like the format to begin with. At any rate, I'll still take pre-musk Twitter over Xitter any day.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Things were better before they got worse, sure.

But the problem in these systems is the trade off between centralization (consolidated control and monolithic content) and federation (poor navigation/petty administrative feuds/less quality content). Switching from Twitter to BlueSky relieves you from the current admin's fuckups, but you're still stuck in a flawed system.

[–] realitista@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

I fully agree. When I feel like using a Twitter like platform (which is exceedingly rare), I use Mastodon

[–] caged_danimal@midwest.social 1 points 1 week ago

Dorsey is no longer associated to bluesky. He was removed from their board.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

It's worse than that.

Blockchain Capital LLC was co-founded by Steve Bannon pal Brock Pierce, a major crypto advocate, perennial presidential candidate, and close friend of Eric Adams. Pierce has dozens of other shady MAGA/Russia ties as well.

https://toad.social/@davetroy/113476797192400901

Dorsey's already out, the people running the project are from the TESCREAL gang.

[–] capital@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

My issue with BS is it took VC money from crypto bros.

What do we think will happen when they come looking for their returns on investment?