this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2023
1196 points (95.6% liked)

memes

16510 readers
2759 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (4 children)

It is hyperbole, but the problem is that it's using a word that was supposed to specify that something was not hyperbole as hyperbole, rendering it useless.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

rendering it useless

Another example of hyperbole.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Okay, rendering it far less useful.

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

Except some of the earliest uses of the word "literally" that didn't pertain to letters and glyps we in the form of hyperbole.
Literal as factual and literal as exaggeration both about the same age and precedent, and have been used long enough that it's just part of the English language at this point.
May as well complain about how "discreet" and "indiscreet" are opposites, but "flammable" and "inflammable" are the same.

https://people.sc.fsu.edu/~jburkardt/fun/wordplay/autoanto.html

English is a language of contradictions and massively confusing syntax. News at 11.

[–] ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

People, including many famous authors, have been using literally this way for hundreds of years.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Yes, but its use to mean its opposite didn't become widespread until the past decade or so.

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

People have been complaining about it longer than a decade, so you're way off there.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/literally

Tldr: common use in the "figurative" sense for since the 1800s.

[–] ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Incorrect. People have been using it the way you are complaining about for hundreds of years. It’s a new phenomenon that people complain about it being used the way you disapprove of. I’d attribute the recent complaints to lack of literary exposure and anti intellectualism in recent years.