this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2024
170 points (94.3% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2216 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/21917446

Ballot in question:

Mayor:

District 1:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GuyDudeman@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (8 children)

I have no idea what party these people belong to. It's not listed on the sheet. Their policy positions aren't shown. Their endorsements aren't shown. Nobody knows who the fuck any of these people are.

What you need Ranked Choice Voting for is Congress and the Presidency. Local elections also need to be partisan. Otherwise how the fuck do you know where any of the candidates even generally stand on the issues?

[–] frickineh@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago

Local candidates usually have websites, do interviews with local papers, and are suuuper excited to talk to potential voters, so people could look at any of that?

[–] Bookmeat@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The city or county will probably have a thing called a website where you can read about all of those things for each candidate.

[–] GuyDudeman@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

Is the website in the voting booth?

[–] HidingUnderHats@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We do all of our voting by mail and get a pamphlet with most of the serious candidates. It is really great and we have like two weeks to work on it. It isn't like we showed up at the poll and were confronted with this and had to fill it out on the spot.

[–] GuyDudeman@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

We should also make vote by mail mandatory.

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Local elections also need to be partisan. Otherwise how the fuck do you know where any of the candidates even generally stand on the issues?

I'd rather parties have no official role so we're actually voting for people to represent us. Candidates have a responsibility to get their message out, and voters have a responsibility to do some research.

[–] GuyDudeman@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago

But that just doesn’t happen. We have to plan for the lowest common denominator.

[–] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Yeah, researching candidates is great and all, but like they didn't exactly set themselves up for success with this ballot design.

It kinda sucks ass. :/

[–] finderscult@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

... You do research, you have a fucking week minimum after you receive your ballot. This isn't complicated. Parties also have nothing to do with an individual representatives politics.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Non partisan elections.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

I prefer having ballots not say what party the person is in. Then people actually have to know who they are voting for, not just blindly check a box beside R or D every time.