I was just reading this post https://old.reddit.com/r/selfhosted/comments/1gmv76n/is_reddit_going_to_remain_the_primary_space_for/ and many barely see the fediverse as an alternative and they seem to have a negative bias towards it. Super ironic when it comes to the self-hosting community. Yes, some instances are problematic, yes, some devs might have had problematic views. But it doesn't really matter when it's federated and FOSS. I think it's clear-cut that the selfhosting community on Lemmy is a perfect alternative to reddit. Why is there such a negative bias?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Lemmy has in may places worse moderation than reddit.

yet this is exactly what the fediverse was designed to work around. giving the power back to the users. when .ml decides to block a bunch of shit due to butt-hurt mods, communities can be moved elsewhere without everyone having to make new accounts.

[–] BonerMan@ani.social 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

These many places tend to be the biggest and most popular places...

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

agreed that we need to work on scaling out horizontally. i think that ironically poor moderation will help with this over time. it took reddit 20 years to get where it is.

[–] BonerMan@ani.social -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Lemmy instances are a pain in the ass to keep working, most people with a life won't do that and people without a life are usually extremists.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

sounds like a lot of conjecture to me. i think there is hope in groups owning, operating and funding their own instances. software platforms will get better over time. funding pathways will get better over time.

i dont think we should just toss our hands up and say 'nope, too hard. only jerks need apply'