Asklemmy

43611 readers

1229 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

136

On a low gravity planet, would it make more sense to build habitat domes or habitat sky-scrapers? (lemmy.ca)

submitted 11 months ago by lazylion_ca@lemmy.ca to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

44 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You won't even need to dig the hole! If you do this before much other habitations on the planet, you could precisely direct astroids to impact the same place to dig the whole for you. I think Cody's Lab did a video about it, but I can't find it right now.

[–] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

Good odds there’s already a bunch of craters too, one of them will fit the bill