this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2024
1527 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

59555 readers
3193 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FrankFrankson@lemmy.world 208 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (7 children)

Touchscreens were never popular with customers. Manufacturers kept cramming touchscreens in cars and using them to control everything becuase they were being stupid with new tech.

Edit: I guess I should have been clearer. I was talking about as a replacement for tactile controlls in a car like the article is talking about. Reverse cameras and other things that are good to have a touch screen for make perfect sense but using your touch screen to control your Air conditioning in a way that you have to divert your attention from the road to operate sliders and buttons on a touch screen is dumb as hell.

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 108 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Also the fact that touch screens are cheaper to build with how expensive battery tech has been in electric cars.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 41 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Cheaper to build and can be adjusted and patched as you go

[–] rizo@sh.itjust.works 36 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

One of the biggest problems with touch is still that you have to take your eyes off the road (for quite some time). I have no issue if we are talking about some internal media center stuff and you still have some sort of haptic button on a steering wheel. But as soon as we are talking about AC, fans and everything you sometimes need to drive, I'm off.

[–] eatCasserole@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago

Teslas are so bad for this, that whole "all the controls are on a big ipad" setup should be illegal.

[–] Anivia@feddit.org 42 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Touchscreens are great to have, controlling Android Auto or Apple Carplay with physical buttons like you have to do in a Mazda is a nightmare.

The problem is when the touchscreen is used as a replacement for physical controls, instead of an addition. Stuff like controlling your climate control should not be exclusively controlled through the touchscreen

And don't even get me started about VWs stupid decision to put touch controls on the steering wheel. At least they backpedaled on that decision pretty quickly

[–] svtdragon@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

My wife and I drive almost the same model of Audi, separated by a couple of years. One still has physical buttons for infotainment and one has a touch screen, but both support Android Auto and CarPlay.

I prefer the physical controls for it, because I can glance at the screen and know "turn right two clicks and press down" to get where I want, and then look back at the road while I do it.

[–] dditty@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I added Android Auto and Apple Carplay to my 2016 Audi via an aftermarket add-on module that ties into its native MMI system and it requires me to use the dial and buttons to interact with it. I also really like doing it that way for the reason you described. I can easily switch apps and navigate menus by counting clicks without taking my eyes off the road. Plus I can still use my phone for some of the more complicated interactions like entering in addresses that Google Assistant can't decipher (only when the vehicle is stopped and in a brief and safe manner, of course)

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 36 points 2 weeks ago

I love my touchscreen, it’s great for media control, map, etc.

Mind you that is all it does, every other feature is behind a physical button. Which I also love.

Touchscreen for some things, physical for the rest.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 22 points 2 weeks ago

In my 2021 Seat Leon the controls for defogging the windscreen and the heated rear window (both essential in Sweden) are placed on a cluster of touch buttons below and to the left of the steering wheel.

It is insane, you have to take you eyes off the road and lean forward to press them.

Also, to activate the seat heater, you need to access the climate panel on the infotainment, so you loose the view of any CarPlay navigation.

The car has dedicated touch surfaces to change the AC temp, but the main ones are next to the power button touch area for the infotainment, and none of the areas are illuminated.

I like my car, it is fun and comfortable, but the overreliance of touch controls is infuriating at times.

[–] DannyMac@lemm.ee 16 points 2 weeks ago

Touchscreens are cheaper UI part too. It saved money and "looked cool"... Win-win for shareholders

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Touch screens also seem like they would be easier to integrate with subscription services. Auto manufacturers are looking to make things like heated seats a subscription.

Cars have been getting steadily worse. There doesn’t seem to be any enforcement of recalls (has anyone satisfactorily had the Honda Civic 2016-2021 air conditioning resolved? How much did you spend?)

If they can take cars away from us entirely, and move to us renting self driving cars, that’s what they would really want to do. Pay for your radio, pay for heat and AC…

[–] Sineljora@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

A screen is legally required for the backup camera in the US since 2016.