this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2024
274 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

59555 readers
4359 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Solar panels are also added weight, which reduces range. Any way you look at it, it makes more sense to have the solar panels at a base location you go back to.

I guess an RV, or a camp trailer, makes sense to have panels on it, but that's about it

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

There's also things like Sentinel mode on Teslas that use power.

My main gripe is people think a solar car will never need to be charged, or only on trips, and that's just not the case.

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Aptera claims to be able to get 40 miles a day via solar. Most people drive less than that per day.

[–] oyo@lemm.ee 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Solar panels are incredibly thin and light. There is no reason not to include them.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago

Price. Large standardized panels are cheaper. Until you cover static otherwise unused space with solar, there's no way this car is a better use of money.