Technology

59769 readers

3084 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

625

Sweden, Norway rethink plans for cashless societies over fears that fully digital payment systems would leave them vulnerable to Russian security threats (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 1 month ago by 0x815@feddit.org to c/technology@lemmy.world

156 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://feddit.org/post/4262252

A combination of good high-speed internet coverage, high digital literacy rates, large rural populations and fast-growing fintech industries had put the Nordic neighbours on a fast track to a future without cash.

[...]

But Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022 and a subsequent rise in cross-border hybrid warfare and cyber-attacks blamed on pro-Russia groups have prompted a rethink.

[...]

The Swedish government has since completely overhauled its defence and preparedness strategy, joining Nato, starting a new form of national service and reactivating its psychological defence agency to combat disinformation from Russia and other adversaries. Norway has tightened controls on its previously porous border with Russia.

[...]

[Norway's] justice and public security ministry said it “recommends everyone keep some cash on hand due to the vulnerabilities of digital payment solutions to cyber-attacks”. It said the government took preparedness seriously “given the increasing global instability with war, digital threats, and climate change. As a result, they’ve ensured that the right to pay with cash is strengthened”.

[...]

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] KomfortablesKissen@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I think the idea was that you can't hoard anything, and stealing or reusing is harder. But it does make the central management way more powerful than it should be. But it's normal bank standard.

What do you mean with "dystopian statist money"?

[–] oldfart@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Since when keeping the money you earned is "hoarding" and a bad thing?

I think money with expiration period that exists to prevent people from having savings is very dystopian, I don't feel like there is something to explain.

[–] KomfortablesKissen@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

For the individual saving is something very good. For the economy, however, a money hoarder is dead weight. It's why inflation won't ever completely go away, because it discourages hoarding (investing/bringing it to the bank can counteract this, that's why I didn't call it saving the second and third time)

It really depends who the issuer of the certificates (wallets) is. The funds get automatically transferred and won't be lost, it's "just" a privacy problem (plus the issuer will probably be able to interfere).

So the idea isn't that dystopian, but it very much depends on the implementation.

[–] oldfart@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In the conflict of interest of individuals vs. "the economy" I'm on the side of individuals, sorry.

[–] KomfortablesKissen@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago

I'm with you on that.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If he doesn't like hoarding, why doesn't it just inflate?

[–] KomfortablesKissen@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago

I think the reason for this implementation is more the theft prevention. This sounds very mich like certificates to me