this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2024
545 points (92.5% liked)

Technology

76424 readers
5103 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The question that everyone has been dying to know has been answered. Finally! What will scientists study next?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, that’s why we need at least... two of them.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

the paper used the entire population (200 thousand) and would take some 10 ^ 10 ^ 7 heat deaths of the universe

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It could happen the very first time a monkey sat down at a typewriter. It's just very unlikely.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago (5 children)

from the wiki article
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinite_monkey_theorem

If there were as many monkeys as there are atoms in the observable universe typing extremely fast for trillions of times the life of the universe, the probability of the monkeys replicating even a single page of Shakespeare is unfathomably small.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

... the probability of the monkeys replicating even a single page of Shakespeare is unfathomably small.

But not zero.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Basically nothing is ever truly zero

[–] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Someone wiser than me already said that it already has happened: 1 ape did, in fact, write the complete works of Shakespeare.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] Klear@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

monkey c monkey do

[–] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fair enough. I wouldn’t want to insult the Librarian.

[–] CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Apes are monkeys though, just like we're apes and birds are dinosaurs

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

We are apes and birds are dinosaurs, but monkeys and apes are distinct categories under primates so no, apes are not monkeys.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The probability of lots of things is zero. The probability of a monkey typing a Chinese character on an English keyboard is zero.

Similar idea: there are an infinite amount of numbers between zero and one, but none of those numbers is two.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago
[–] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago

Weird how neither of those numbers are infinities. Almost like the numbers used are unfathomably small in comparison.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

So you’re telling me… there’s a chance!

Sorry, I’m sort of lampooning comments like the one above and below you where people just can’t resist focusing on the possibility, no matter how ridiculously remote it seems. For myself, there’s a point of “functionally zero odds” that I’m willing to accept and move on with my life.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 3 points 1 year ago

so you're saying there's a chance...

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

So you're saying there's a chance.

[–] rimu@piefed.social 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

ok so the monkeys need to type faster

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

Let's put them in open spaces in offices and micro-mananage then, that'll work.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Irrelevant. The heat death of the universe is a constraint unrelated to the premise of the original problem.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I don't think it's a constraint, it's more like a measuring stick to try to show how ridiculously long that time is

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It's really not that long, if we can't get monkeys to write Shakespeare.

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We could breed monkeys to much higher populations.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If we're considering even chimps "monkeys", there's already eight billion of them, I think that's enough.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

enough to cut a few zeros of a number with 10 million of them