Not The Onion

17225 readers

2001 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

kescusay@lemmy.world

Chevron boss says the $300 billion oil giant has changed life on Earth for the better: ‘We’re not selling a product that is evil’ (finance.yahoo.com)

submitted 2 years ago by empireOfLove@lemmy.one to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Says exec of company that has objectively caused more environmental harm to the world than any others

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] bioemerl@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

we had the technology to move off of them

We still don't have the technology to move of them. Energy storage is severely lacking.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I bet if we had started the process in the 1970s like Carter wanted we'd be a lot further along by now.

[–] bioemerl@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's possible, but it's not like technology halted in that time and there has been a big energy independence drive regardless of Reagan.

The harsh truth is that we still need fossil fuels today.

We're probably going to need them for decades to come, even if we have massive green energy drives.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

big energy independence drive

This is a great weasel word. "Energy independence." Like we're going to hook cables up to George Washington and run on carbon-neutral Freedom Juice.™

"Energy independence" still means using fossil fuels. Just maybe different ones like natural gas instead of coal. There's less emissions, sure, but it's not anything like what Carter envisioned: Solar power stations in LEO, beaming gigawatts of carbon neutral power down from space.