this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
123 points (94.9% liked)

Asklemmy

43939 readers
673 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As I was reading about the Valley of the Kings again, I wonder why that was actually legal.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] benignintervention@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

If you ask native Americans, it is. Source: listened to stories from one

[–] maniel@sopuli.xyz 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, but those greaves are a part of a still existing culture and religion/beliefs, I don't think it's the case with the ancient Egypt, Vikings graves etc

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 5 points 3 weeks ago

That shouldnt matter. It remains an arbitrary decision by the living, who have no way of calling in the opinion of the deceased.

When coming across a burial site while doing archeological digging just restore it and move on.

The dignity of a human doesnt go away because people think his culture doesnt exist anymore.

[–] Jamin@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

in the U.S we have the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), passed in 1990, requires museums and federal agencies to return Native American human remains and cultural items to their tribes. It’s all about respecting Indigenous heritage by ensuring that these items are returned to their rightful communities.

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

passed in 1990

Yeah it's all about respecting indigenous heritage, sure. Remind me again, in which year they dismantled the genocider statues at Rushmore?

[–] MeowZedong@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago

In 2023, the US government returned the remains of some children who were sent to the boarding schools (it's still ongoing). Aside from the bones of children, there were also animal bones. Why were there animal bones mixed in? Because the children's remains were pulled from where the school's rubbish was buried. Separating the bones after all this time would be difficult.

I can think of no better reflection of how the US government treats indigenous people wherever it encounters them. Indigenous Americans have probably received some of the worst treatment. As always, actions speak louder than words.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

If you had actually ASKED the Sioux of the Black Hills about this, you'd know they've told pretty much everyone "yeah we don't like Mt Rushmore, we don't like Crazy Horse's relief carving either, but we think destroying them is more disrespectful than just leaving them to fall apart on their own." Like, this isn't an uncommon thought. It's just more complex than "blow them up".