this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
1184 points (97.6% liked)

politics

19144 readers
2177 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 4 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

You seem to be under the impression that your not voting changes the binary outcome.

This pyrrhic victory neglects to recognize that either Trump or Harris will be elected. And there is no circumstance that Trump is better than Harris. Not on women's rights. Not on climate change. Not on Ukraine. And not on Gaza.

Whether you like it or not, it's Harris or Trump. Sticking your head in the sand doesn't change this fact.

So both the moral and pragmatic solution is to choose the lesser evil that gives the highest odds to improve all these groups. Which is Harris. Factually.

[–] Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

You seem to be under the impression that your not voting changes the binary outcome.

Me voting wouldn't change the outcome either, considering I can't.

 

So both the moral and pragmatic solution is to choose the lesser evil

Is killing wrong?

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

Yes, killing wrong.

Killing more people with less chance to kill fewer people more wrong.

Again, dichotomous choice. Easiest choice to make, really.

[–] Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

If killing is wrong, then voting to kill some rather than more is still wrong.

I request better options.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Correction: it is less wrong.

Standing by and letting someone kill more when your action could've resulted in less makes you as culpable in the killing as Biden and Harris themselves.

[–] Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

We're standing by to let killing happen right now. I'm the one saying that's unacceptable.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago

You can't vote so you're irrelevant but still, no, the only agency I'm privileged to have is my vote. Doing nothing means more die. Voting Harris means less die. Simple.