this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2024
75 points (87.1% liked)

Asklemmy

43932 readers
488 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I am seriously thinking of commissioning a simple tungsten cube emblazoned with cuneiform style figures, set up on a stainless steel platform. For the legacy. For someone millions of years from now.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] dharmacurious@slrpnk.net 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm not sure I've ever seen "genital" in the singular before, and now I'm trying to determine what qualifies as a singular genital and not the whole set of genitals.

[โ€“] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Good catch. Some may prefer one genitalius to indeterminately many genitalia.

[โ€“] dharmacurious@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 weeks ago

There have been nights when I definitely would have preferred indeterminately many genitalia, but to be honest, on a few occasions, one genetalius would have been preferable. Sometimes there are just too many verpi and not enough gurgustia.