Technology

59666 readers

2672 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

1524

Linus Torvalds reckons AI is ‘90% marketing and 10% reality’ (www.tomshardware.com)

submitted 4 weeks ago by vegeta@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

236 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 27 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

ah yes it's reactionary to checks notes not support the righteous biggest bubble since dotcom era

you okay out there bud?

[+] kitnaht@lemmy.world -10 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

You might want to look up the definition of reactionary. Because that's...exactly what it means. To oppose reform/advancements.

You okay there bud?

In political science, a reactionary or a reactionist is a person who holds political views that favor a return to the status quo ante—the previous political state of society—which the person believes possessed positive characteristics that are absent from contemporary society.

Congratulations -- Currently you and 18 others are not smarter than an average high schooler.

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Opposing actual fraud isn't what reactionary means.

[–] kitnaht@lemmy.world -5 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

You've got a pretty high bar of proof for proving "actual fraud"...

You can't provably say that this is a "bubble" as claimed. The tools do what they purport to do. Where's the fraud?

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

It's not remotely within the realm of plausibility that Sam Altman genuinely believes any of the horseshit he spews. (And that's ignoring that they gained their funding by lying about the core intent of their organization by pretending to be serving the public interest and not profiteering.)

[–] kitnaht@lemmy.world -1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

It's not remotely within the realm of plausibility that Sam Altman genuinely believes any of the horseshit he spews.

Welcome to earth. That's basically every business ever, and you'll quite literally never be able to prove that in court; which is the litmus test for this claim.