this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2024
1378 points (98.1% liked)

Science Memes

11205 readers
2529 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 11 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

it's not encouraging to think of someone being in med school and not reading the course description before signing up. if there was no course description that's almost even worse

[–] NielsBohron@lemmy.world 16 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

As someone who teaches chemistry to premeds, this is not surprising at all. To make a sweeping generalization, premeds, med students, and the MDs they become are some of the most entitled, condescending, and oblivious people I've ever met.

There are exceptions of course, but in general, I can't stand most premeds and I really can't stand how our culture puts MDs on a pedestal.

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 weeks ago

yea, a friend of mine from high school went through all of it and became a general surgeon. and i've heard stories. that and my experience from dating and living with a CFer lung transplant patient probably gave me as much of an "outsider's view" of the medical/hospital industry as one could possibly have

the MD=pedestal thing died for me long ago

i know i'm not talking about the "point" of the post. don't care.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

So I'm curious. The way I see it, the actual practicing of medicine doesn't advance the field itself. What advances it is research and development. Do the researchers actually go though med school or is that path more like biology PhD, chemistry PhD, etc?

[–] NielsBohron@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

There are medical researchers that have MD's, but they are not practicing physicians (usually). There are MD/PhD programs that are aimed toward medical research fields (usually with the PhD being in biology or chemistry as you mentioned), and lots of biological and biomedical engineers working on certain medical fields as well (especially using stem cells and other chemical cues to regrow tissues). So yeah, biology- and physiology-adjacent sciences are where most of the actual advances are happening.

Actually practicing medicine is basically like being a mechanic that specializes in keeping one particularly poorly designed piece of equipment running.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

So was a wrong, most researchers go through MD/PhD programs? Like what percent of researchers go through medical school? 50/50?

[–] NielsBohron@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

I don't know that you're wrong, because those MD/PhD programs are exceptionally demanding (but are a good way to avoid med school debt for some). It's more that even for pure MD's, research is a very, very different career path than practicing physician. I think researchers still have to go through residency, but after that they're mostly designing and arranging clinical trials, writing grants, interacting with related university departments, etc.

So, you know, research stuff rather than patient stuff.

edit: to address your actual question, I have no idea what the numbers for each path look like. A lot of those fields get so interrelated that it probably depend a lot on how you define "medical research." Does genetics count? Genomics? Biomedical engineering, definitely, but what about the material scientists that develop the new dental polymers? It all gets pretty hazy when you drill down on specifics

Edit 2: I also suppose I should say that my experience with science research is almost entirely in public/university research from about a decade back, so current private sector research could vary a lot from my experience. I don't think it's that different though, given what I've heard from friends and coworkers.

[–] Kuori@hexbear.net 10 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] iii@mander.xyz 2 points 4 weeks ago

We all understand the point. But it's important to question the source. It suggests a gullability, or fabrication.

[–] Adkml@hexbear.net 7 points 4 weeks ago

It was probablly just a list of 20 humanities electives they had to pick 4 of for gen Ed requirements (not say9ng this is a bad thing maybe if there was more of this 1/4 of every engineering class wouldn't go straight to Lockheed martin)

They're supposed to be less rigorous and a little more general than other courses, this is really grasping at straws for a reason to ignore the point being made.

[–] Chuymatt@beehaw.org 5 points 4 weeks ago

There might have been a less than clear course description. Also, it may have been the lack of sleep.